صورة غلاف أمازون
صورة من Amazon.com
صورة الغلاف المخصصة
صورة الغلاف المخصصة

Securities against misrule [Texte imprimé] : juries, assemblies, elections / by Jon Elster

بواسطة:المساهم (المساهمين):نوع المادة : نصنصتفاصيل النشر:New York : Cambridge University Press, 2013وصف:1 vol. (295 p.) : ill., cartes ; 24 cmتدمك:
  • 978-1-107-03173-9
الموضوع:تصنيف DDC:
  • 302.3 23E
تصنيفات أخرى:
  • 302.3
ملخص:"This book proposes a normative theory of collective decision making, inspired by Jeremy Bentham but not including his utilitarian philosophy. The central proposal is that in designing democratic institutions one should reduce as much as possible the impact of self-interest, passion, prejudice, and bias on the decision makers, and then let the chips fall where they may. There is no independently defined good outcome that institutions can track, nor is there any way of reliably selecting good decision makers. In addition to a long initial chapter that surveys theories of collective decision making, notably social-choice theory, and a chapter expounding and discussing Bentham,Ŵs views, historical chapters on the jury, constituent assemblies, and electoral systems develop and illustrate the main ideas. This work draws on a welter of case studies and historical episodes, from Thucydides and Plutarch to the present. It is also grounded in psychology, behavioral economics, and law"-- Provided by publisher
نوع المادة:
وسوم من هذه المكتبة لا توجد وسوم لهذا العنوان في هذه المكتبة. قم بتسجيل الدخول لإضافة الأوسمة
التقييم بالنجوم
    متوسط التقييم: 0.0 (0 صوتًا)
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية المجموعة رقم الطلب رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
Livre Livre Bibliothèque centrale Collection générale 302.3 / 499 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) 1 المتاح 000005521579

"This book proposes a normative theory of collective decision making, inspired by Jeremy Bentham but not including his utilitarian philosophy. The central proposal is that in designing democratic institutions one should reduce as much as possible the impact of self-interest, passion, prejudice, and bias on the decision makers, and then let the chips fall where they may. There is no independently defined good outcome that institutions can track, nor is there any way of reliably selecting good decision makers. In addition to a long initial chapter that surveys theories of collective decision making, notably social-choice theory, and a chapter expounding and discussing Bentham,Ŵs views, historical chapters on the jury, constituent assemblies, and electoral systems develop and illustrate the main ideas. This work draws on a welter of case studies and historical episodes, from Thucydides and Plutarch to the present. It is also grounded in psychology, behavioral economics, and law"-- Provided by publisher

Bibliogr. p. 289-313

لا توجد تعليقات على هذا العنوان.