صورة غلاف أمازون
صورة من Amazon.com
صورة الغلاف المخصصة
صورة الغلاف المخصصة

Ethnic struggle, coexistence, and democratization in Eastern Europe [Texte imprimé] / Sherrill Stroschein

بواسطة:نوع المادة : نصنصالسلاسل:Cambridge studies in contentious politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)تفاصيل النشر:Cambridge ; New York ; Melbourne [etc.] : Cambridge University Press, 2012وصف:1 vol. (XXIV-289 p.) : graph., cartes ; 24 cmتدمك:
  • 978-1-107-00524-2
الموضوع:تصنيف DDC:
  • 320.947 23E
تصنيفات أخرى:
  • 320.9
المحتويات:
1. Ethnic protest, moderation, and democratization -- 2. Time, process, and events in democratization -- 3. Ethnic contention in context -- 4. Local violence and uncertainty in Târgul Mureș, 1990 -- 5. The power of symbols: Romanians, Hungarians, and King Mathias in Cluj -- 6. Forging language laws: schools and sign wars -- 7. Debating local governance: autonomy, local control, and minority enclaves -- 8. Implications of group interaction
ملخص:"This book argues that protest by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought about policy changes and integrated Hungarian minorities into the democratic process. Ethnic protest allowed groups to learn about the nature and limits of each other's claims, facilitating new democratic institutions"-- Provided by publisherملخص:"In societies divided on ethnic and religious lines, problems of democracy are magnified , particularly where groups are mobilized into parties. With the principle of majority rule, minorities should be less willing to endorse democratic institutions where their parties persistently lose elections. While such problems should also hamper transitions to democracy, several diverse Eastern European states have formed democracies even under these conditions. In this book, Sherrill Stroschein argues that sustained protest and contention by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought concessions on policies that they could not achieve through the ballot box, in contrast to Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In Romania and Slovakia, contention during the 1990s made each group accustomed to each other,Ŵs claims, and aware of the degree to which each could push its own. Ethnic contention became a de facto deliberative process that fostered a moderation of group stances, allowing democratic consolidation to slowly and organically take root"-- Provided by publisher
نوع المادة:
وسوم من هذه المكتبة لا توجد وسوم لهذا العنوان في هذه المكتبة. قم بتسجيل الدخول لإضافة الأوسمة
التقييم بالنجوم
    متوسط التقييم: 0.0 (0 صوتًا)
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية المجموعة رقم الطلب رقم النسخة حالة تاريخ الإستحقاق الباركود
Livre Livre Bibliothèque centrale En accès libre Collection générale 320.9 / 1217 (إستعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) 1 المتاح 000005537648

Bibliogr. p. 261-279

1. Ethnic protest, moderation, and democratization -- 2. Time, process, and events in democratization -- 3. Ethnic contention in context -- 4. Local violence and uncertainty in Târgul Mureș, 1990 -- 5. The power of symbols: Romanians, Hungarians, and King Mathias in Cluj -- 6. Forging language laws: schools and sign wars -- 7. Debating local governance: autonomy, local control, and minority enclaves -- 8. Implications of group interaction

"This book argues that protest by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought about policy changes and integrated Hungarian minorities into the democratic process. Ethnic protest allowed groups to learn about the nature and limits of each other's claims, facilitating new democratic institutions"-- Provided by publisher

"In societies divided on ethnic and religious lines, problems of democracy are magnified , particularly where groups are mobilized into parties. With the principle of majority rule, minorities should be less willing to endorse democratic institutions where their parties persistently lose elections. While such problems should also hamper transitions to democracy, several diverse Eastern European states have formed democracies even under these conditions. In this book, Sherrill Stroschein argues that sustained protest and contention by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought concessions on policies that they could not achieve through the ballot box, in contrast to Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In Romania and Slovakia, contention during the 1990s made each group accustomed to each other,Ŵs claims, and aware of the degree to which each could push its own. Ethnic contention became a de facto deliberative process that fostered a moderation of group stances, allowing democratic consolidation to slowly and organically take root"-- Provided by publisher

لا توجد تعليقات على هذا العنوان.