000			01982cab a2200385 i 4500
001			a595837
008			150202s2015 xxk 000 0 eng d
009			595837
035			_a1459115302
040			_aFRAS _bfre _cFRAS _dFRAS _eAFNOR
043			_afw----- _aff-----
072			_aOM
082	0	4	_a961.00072 _223A
084			_a961
100	1		_aLecocq, Baz _eAuteur _4070 _9284090
245	1	0	_aDistant shores : _ba historiographic view on trans-Saharan space / _cBaz lecocq
300			_ap. 23-36
504			_aNotes bibliogr.
520			_aThis article addresses how scholarship has formulated human connections and ruptures over the Sahara. However, these formulations were, and still are, based in both physical and discursive realities that have been developed in Africa itself. The idea of a dividing Sahara is based on historical political divisions - despite a homogenous political culture in the region - and by locally developed notions of race and religion, brought about by trade and justified in Islamic religious discourse. The Saharan divide acquired a new reading in colonial historiography, which, in turn, informed scholarly work until well into the 1960s. I will suggest that both colonial and postcolonial research on the differences and connections between the Saharan shores are suffering from a civilisational bias towards North Africa
650		4	_aHISTORIOGRAPHIE _92162
650		4	_aRACISME _94997
650		4	_aCOLONISATION _91629
650		4	_aISLAM _91184
650		4	_aIDENTITE CULTURELLE _91174
651		4	_aMAGHREB _9247730
651		4	_aAFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE _92844
773	0		_tThe Journal of African history. - _gVol. 56, n. 1, 2015, p. 23-36. - _dCambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1960- _x0021-8537. - _oCote de la revue : B1 83. - _w2829
856	0		_uhttp://www.fondation.org.ma/dsp/index/a595837-22
930			_a595837
931			_aa595837
990			_aEl Basri
095			_amr
999			_c532531 _d532531